Показати скорочений опис матеріалу

dc.contributor.authorWeber, Michel
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T08:04:07Z
dc.date.available2021-07-23T08:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationWeber M. Process and individuality / Michel Weber // Сучасне буття філософії : Філософія в єдності культурно-історичного процесу : Наук.–практ. конференція, 27–28 листопада 2012 р.: Тези. – Дніпропетровськ : НГУ, 2012. – С. 28-30uk_UA
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.nmu.org.ua/handle/123456789/158436
dc.description.abstractWhitehead's categories are notoriously difficult to sketch in a single paper's section, but his basic worldview isn't. Like all thinkers worthy of the name, Whitehead recognized the urgency to do somehow justice to both becoming and to being. With Bergson and Alexander (to name only two philosophers with who he enjoyed special Wahlverwandtschaften), he envisioned the ultimacy of time, i.e., of creativity and becoming. In other words, he claimed that if we start from substance-like premisses, i.e., from “being”, we will not understand“becoming” (as the history of philosophy. eloquently proves); but if we rather choose to proceed with process-like premisses, i.e., from “becoming”, both dimensions can be coherently articulated.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherНГУuk_UA
dc.titleProcess and individualityuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
dc.identifier.bbkЮ2яЧuk_UA


Долучені файли

Thumbnail

Даний матеріал зустрічається у наступних фондах

Показати скорочений опис матеріалу