Process and individuality
Date Issued
2012
Author(s)
Weber, Michel
Abstract
Whitehead's categories are notoriously difficult to sketch in a single paper's
section, but his basic worldview isn't. Like all thinkers worthy of the name,
Whitehead recognized the urgency to do somehow justice to both becoming and to
being. With Bergson and Alexander (to name only two philosophers with who he enjoyed special Wahlverwandtschaften), he envisioned the ultimacy of time, i.e., of creativity and becoming. In other words, he claimed that if we start from substance-like premisses, i.e., from “being”, we will not understand“becoming” (as the history of philosophy. eloquently proves); but if we rather choose to proceed with process-like premisses, i.e., from “becoming”, both dimensions can be coherently articulated.
section, but his basic worldview isn't. Like all thinkers worthy of the name,
Whitehead recognized the urgency to do somehow justice to both becoming and to
being. With Bergson and Alexander (to name only two philosophers with who he enjoyed special Wahlverwandtschaften), he envisioned the ultimacy of time, i.e., of creativity and becoming. In other words, he claimed that if we start from substance-like premisses, i.e., from “being”, we will not understand“becoming” (as the history of philosophy. eloquently proves); but if we rather choose to proceed with process-like premisses, i.e., from “becoming”, both dimensions can be coherently articulated.
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Тезисы конференции _итог_NTВ 453206-28-30.pdf
Size
269.87 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):bb5d1f6c76761ab32521585ff6308af7